Environmental Groups Oppose Open Market Emissions Trading
“Economic incentive programs are a viable solution to some environmental problems,” states the letter. “Yet it is imperative that these programs match flexibility with the highest standard of accountability, such as that achieved through explicit caps on emissions, accurate emissions quantification, rigorous monitoring, and certain enforceability.”
“According to EPA’s own experts, open market trading is not ready for prime time,” said Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, which represents employees within EPA who have raised problems with the plan. “If EPA approves the four state trading programs without fixing the major quantification and enforcement weaknesses, it risks seriously undermining clean air protection nationally.”
The EPA’s own Office of Inspector General released a letter this week announcing it will investigate planned and completed trades under the state programs, calling the investigation “both warranted and timely.” The probe will examine the enforceability and rigor of open market trading as well as EPA’s internal approval process for the state programs.
“The public’s support for flexible approaches like emissions trading depends on the establishment of explicit, binding caps on pollution. Giving companies the privilege of trading without emissions caps and full accountability is self-defeating,” said Joe Goffman, senior attorney at Environmental Defense.
A copy of the letter and complete list of signatories may be found at www.environmentaldefense.org
With more than 3 million members, Environmental Defense Fund creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships to turn solutions into action. edf.org
Latest press releases
-
Trump Administration’s New Tax Credit Guidance Is “Another Senseless Attack on Clean Energy”
August 15, 2025 -
More Dire Colorado River Reservoir Forecasts Reinforce Urgent Need for Action
August 15, 2025 -
EDF, UCS Ask Court to Enjoin Trump Administration’s Brazenly Unlawful Use of Corrupt “Science” Report
August 15, 2025 -
Independent Report Finds that the Trump Administration’s Orders to Keep Coal-fired Power Plants Running Could Cost Consumers between $3-6 Billion a Year
August 14, 2025 -
EDF Strongly Opposes Trump Administration Proposals to Eliminate Protections for Air Pollution from Power Plants
August 13, 2025 -
Some Truck Makers Challenge Vital Clean Truck Partnership with California
August 12, 2025